DAPNET Forums Archive › Forums › Sustainable Living and Land use › Sustainable Forestry › logging arches
- This topic has 25 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by Dog_River.
- AuthorPosts
- March 31, 2008 at 9:51 pm #39544simon lenihanParticipant
I recently watched a dvd of brant ainsworth logging in new york, it shows quiet a few different arches. What i would like to know from the folk that have used them is, [1] If the log is raised too high will the back of the log dig in to the ground causing more friction. [2] With a walking beam logging arch is your turning circle reduced due to the log jamming against the arch. [ 3] will you get alot of tongue slap using a 2 wheel logging arch on rough ground.
simon lenihanApril 1, 2008 at 9:00 am #46273Carl RussellModeratorSimon, There is probably more PSI on the portion of the log that touches the ground, but comparatively less overall because weight is also being carried by the wheels. There is much less friction though, making it easier for the animals to pull the load, and causing much less soil disturbance.
Pole slap can be eliminated by correct fitting of the harness, particularly using a D-ring harness where the weight is born on the back pad. When the traces are hitched the tongue weight should be suspended entirely from the back pad, which creates a taught alignment, eliminating slap or sway. Carl
April 1, 2008 at 10:28 am #46285Donn HewesKeymasterD ring harnesses alleviate tongue slap? This is an attribute that Les should make a bigger emphasis in his talk. The fact that they take away tongue weight from the neck is obvious. For those who feel tongue weight isn’t a problem for them, tongue slap might be a different issue. A really good demonstration would be to lay a half round of fire wood infront of one of the tires of a fore cart and drive over it. that would demonstrate how that harness deals with tongue slap. I don’t think correctly fitting a traditional western brichen harness (correct term?) does anything to prevent tongue slap. If you have a well loaded two wheeled cart and you hit a good root with one wheel the tongue has a lot of lateral load.
April 1, 2008 at 10:57 am #46283john plowdenParticipantTongue slap is hard to eliminate even with a D – If you have the choker hitched high and several inches in front of the axle the weight of the logs will balance out – the horses get used to the tongue sway/slap on smaller obstacles – work slowly over the bigger ones and have the horses sidestep -easing a wheel up and over – The axle angle is important -too much and the tongue is heavy – to little and it will lift when loaded –
JohnApril 1, 2008 at 12:34 pm #46279Jim OstergardParticipantSimon,
Just got back from a short trip and am downloading your JPgs, thanks so much!! On my walking beam I think the turning radius is decreased. The butt will ride up and over the rear tire. I always push this and now and again have to deal with the mess I’ve caused.
Jim OApril 1, 2008 at 12:39 pm #46274Carl RussellModeratorI have to disagree about the difficulty of eliminating tongue slap with the D-ring. My extensive experience with several different logging carts with logs hitched high, or long, or however, has been that when adjusted correctly, and hitched tightly, there is little or none.
This is one of the significant indications that the harness is adjusted correctly.
Les Barden actually points this out in his video by driving the cart over bumpy obstacles.
You can’t prevent swaying, but the pole should only sway stiffly, and not cause slapping. Carl
April 1, 2008 at 1:34 pm #46278Rick AlgerParticipantHello Simon,
1. I haven’t noticed any difference in friction or ground disturbance whether hitched high or low.
2. I’ve never used one.
3. I don’t have a problem on moderately rough ground, but in really rough going I ground skid.
I think the biggest advantage of a two wheel cart is that you can skid tree-length for longer distances. The down side is it requires a bit more time to hook to the hitch, it requires a wider and clearer trail and it requires more space and time to sort wood on the landing. (as opposed to cut-to-length forwardng)
If you
April 1, 2008 at 1:45 pm #46284john plowdenParticipantSway yes – at times making contact with a horse – not swinging wildly to and fro –
April 1, 2008 at 5:32 pm #46275Carl RussellModeratorIn defense of what John was saying about slap associated with pole height and the D-ring harness, several logging carts out there like Forest Products, and Farmer Brown’s, are designed with a very high hitch, to get the logs hitched high.This results in pole height that is too high for normal horses to be able wear the D-ring high enough to get adequate lift on the pole, and in those cases the pole WILL slap back and forth.
Another point about the D-ring and pole slap, is that if the front trace is too long then the D-ring will be too low to get adequate lift on the pole, and the hitch will not be tight.
Logging carts, as Rick says, have their greatest advantage in ease, so they should be designed to facilitate that. Getting a ladder to get up on every time, in my mind is not easy. The effect on the horse, and relation to the harnessing system is extremely important, almost more so than how high they can lift the log. Carl
April 3, 2008 at 1:31 pm #46269Gabe AyersKeymasterOne technique we use is the cradle hitch which allows for a large log to be hitched and lifted from the bottom. This method was explained in an earlier post, which is on this site. This method use two choker chains and hitches to the outside slots and really reduces/eliminates tongue slap. We use the D-ring also and find that this harness reduces slap and sore necks in the summer time. The key is proper adjustment like Dr. D. Ring Les advises.
The primary benefits of the arch are, increased use of the animals tractive power, less impact on the ground and safety for the operator – all of which increase production and income from doing this work.
Simon, send me a mailing address (via email) and if our technologies are compatible I will send you a DVD that has many examples of the arch we use.
We will soon have better graphic of the simple log arch we use on our web site, including detail plans and materials list. I hope to write up some text about the use of the device to accompany this page, once we get through all the other things planned for the near future. It may be a while, spring is here and things are starting to rock and roll in many ways.
July 8, 2008 at 7:09 am #46287cxb100Participantrunescape gold runescape gold
runescape money buy runescape gold
buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling eve isk eve online isk eve isk eve online isk
Fiesta Gold Fiesta Silver Tibia Gold
Age of Conan Gold
buy Age of Conan Gold
aoc goldAugust 12, 2008 at 2:09 pm #46280Jim OstergardParticipantOn this monsoon type day looking over past discussiions and wanted to add a bit more here. Walking beams need some room to turn. Rusty has gotten really good in tight quarters about backing and filling to get to a but which is a plus. If you check out my jpg on the arch you will see that the shafts/pole hook up is low so this might be an asset with a team pole slap which I haven’t had a chance to try. I like Carl do not like to climb a ladder to get on the arch so prefer my lower platform and the slider rig to lift the but. Rusty will haul 20′ by 16″ or better (nearly 200 mbf) in a hitch with out rig. Not all day for sure but it really eases the draft.
best….JimAugust 13, 2008 at 8:02 pm #46270Gabe AyersKeymasterEarlier I had mentioned that we would have better graphics of our simple Charlie Fisher style log arch. This device can be used single or team or multiple hitch.
The new improved 3 – D graphics can be found at:
http://www.healingharvestforestfoundation.org/docs/Log_Arch_Plans.pdf
Thanks DAP folks.
Also wanted to mention that our first installment in a series of segments about HHFF will air on RFD-TV Rural Heritage show starting on the 15th of September.
Hope you all enjoy it and stay tuned to upcoming shows that will have more actual techniques of doing this work safely and efficiently.We want to thank Joe Mischka at Rural Heritage, Bailey’s Forestry Supply and Pennfield Feeds for their support and sponsorship.
Regards,
September 4, 2008 at 9:02 am #46276Carl RussellModeratorI have found that the equipment is not nearly as important as the understanding of the work that is to be done. Jumping over moving logs while trying to drive a team of horses on a skid trail is asking for trouble. Stop them step over the log, reposition yourself, and go again. If the above is any indication of your training in the woods you will have problems no matter what you employ for equipment in the woods.
I have used wheeled rigs in the woods for over twenty years, and found them to be very useful, safe, providing superior protection against soil disturbance. However, I have ground skidded a lot of logs as well, and used sleds and other devices. I say it isn’t as simple as one versus the other, it’s about working horses, or oxen in the woods, and the conditions dictate many of the solutions.
Just a quick aside to the above. I used my oxen for years in the woods on the same log cart that I use for my horses, and found it to be very handy, although pound for pound there is nothing more convenient and maneuverable in the woods than a pair of cattle with yoke only.
One of the features that I really enjoy about using a cart is that I have saw, peavey, extra chain, a tool box, personal safety equipment, choker puller, etc. right there at arms length. That can make all the difference in a day’s work.
Carl
September 5, 2008 at 2:51 am #46271Gabe AyersKeymasterAbout 35 years ago I was skidding on the ground with a double tree and team and had a friend helping. We were also moving laps and tops from a previous harvest down a skid trail we didn’t build. My friend did the step over the log
move, got his foot caught and injured and basically at that time, ended my interest in logging with horses.Skidding on the ground is dangerous, primitive, old fashioned, hillbilly, backwards,
inefficient, environmentally damaging (not be human centered here, but people are part of the environment and if a person gets hurt easily then it would follow reason that the rest of the surroundings may suffer also), and much harder on your horses, mules or oxen.Then at the Mid-Atlantic Winter National Draft Horse pull I met a fellow that said he knew a fellow than ran a crew of 25 teams supplying his sawmill using a “Log Arch”. I went and found that fellow and he was my first mentor on modern horse logging. The device we give away blueprints for on our web site were designed by the late Charlie Fisher, of Andover, Ohio. He spent his life working in the woods with horses.
This “log arch” device is state of the art in many respects, but is not patentable because it is to simple and all the features are ancient, (with the exception of pneumatic rubber tires of course). It is a device because it has no moving parts other than the wheels. The parts that wear out can simply be replaced.
The wheel is a pretty cool invention. We even live on a round planet. So putting some of the load on the wheels, just enough to keep the front end of the log off the ground is an incredible increase in efficiency of moving tons of firewood, pulpwood, saw logs, beam logs, whole smaller trees, etc. It is estimated to increase animal tractive capacity many fold over the course of a days work. Those who have done much of both already know this.
A skid trail less than six feet wide is very reasonable for the spacial arrangement of a healthy vigorous forest made up of superior specimens and appropriate species.
The operation of a logging arch is safer, more efficient and modern.
Yet knowing all that to be absolutely true – we still skid on the ground sometimes. Short skids on step ground can be quickly bunched downhill
to be forwarded with an arch to the landing. But you better know what you are doing and have a great animal to work with.I am totally sold on using a log arch. Yet I don’t sell them, I give the plans away. I know folks that manufacture them here in our community, but any good welder can make one from the blueprints you can download from our website and print and you keep the money in your community.
I wouldn’t consider and can’t imagine serious animal powered forestry without a log arch. Not if you see it as a part of how you make your living.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.